UConn’s Odd Couple

The crowd at the XL Center is on its feet. The Huskies have just erased an 11-point halftime deficit and now Kemba Walker has the ball with a chance to give UConn it’s first lead of the second half. Marquette chooses to double-team him, leaving Niels Giffey open in the corner. Walker finds him, dishes him the ball, and Giffey takes the shot.

Nothing but net.

The basket blew the roof off the XL Center. Marquette’s coach Buzz Williams was forced to call a timeout, causing the UConn bench to clear and prompting Big Red’s U-C-O-N-N chant. The team mobbed Giffey, with Tyler Olander jumping off the bench first and leading the charge. He got there with a huge grin on his face and chest bumped Giffey.

“That’s the way to go!” Olander screamed.

In an up and down season for the two freshmen, the moment exemplified the unique bond that these two unlikely teammates have developed since joining the UConn program.

Like step brothers

Niels Giffey and Tyler Olander are both freshman on the men’s basketball team. Giffey is from Berlin, Germany and Olander, by contrast, is a local product who played his high school ball within walking distance of campus at the nearby E.O. Smith High School. They are also roommates, and despite the vast differences in their backgrounds, they have become very close friends since arriving on campus this past summer.

“Me and Niels? I don’t even know how to describe our relationship,” Olander said. “We’re really good friends and we agree on a lot of stuff. With Niels, it’s really easy to get along with him just because he’s down for whatever. We get along real well, we always go to the dining hall and whatever, stuff like that. We can talk to each other about whatever.”

Olander said their relationship is similar to Dale and Brennan’s from the movie “Step Brothers,” and that they often come up with “random, funny, out-of-nowhere stuff” to do around campus and in their small dorm room in Hilltop. And like in the movie, some of their hijinks seem almost too bizarre to be true.

“Recently, this weekend, Niels came running out the bathroom at me and tried to do a flying kick, he tried to kick me while jumping,” Olander said. “He ran out of the bathroom through our door, and you notice you can’t really run through our room at all, and he just tried to jump and kick me. And it completely failed, he ended up landing on my desk or something, I was like ‘Niels what are you doing?’”

Olander explained that the reason why Giffey tried to dropkick him was because earlier, they had both been in the bathroom using the urinals next to each other, and after Olander finished first, he pushed Giffey as he left so he would “mess up a little.”

“After, he told me that all he was thinking was ‘I’ve got to get him back for doing that,’” Olander said.

Evidently, trying to dropkick him was the best solution.

Olander also recounted a story about how he and Giffey had recently been hanging out with a couple of girls, when Giffey suddenly started singing German drinking songs. Stories like this are apparently the norm for these two.

It’s actually somewhat remarkable how well the two have taken to each other, especially considering that they did not choose to be roommates originally.

“I don’t know who decided that,” Giffey said.

Giffey described his and Tyler’s first meeting as an interesting one, and that he first found out about his roommate assignment as he walked in.

“I walked in here, and this side over here was a huge mess, and on my side there was nothing, and he was sleeping, there was no light on,” Giffey said. “So I just walked in, flipped the light on and coach LaFleur is like ‘Hey, there’s Tyler, he’s your new roommate, why don’t you just show him around?’ And Tyler is like ‘…what?’”

“Yeah I was knocked out and he woke me up,” Olander said. “They told me he was coming but I guess I fell asleep or something. But he came in and kind of put his stuff away. He was hungry so we went down to the Union to get some food, started talking and stuff, so it was pretty good I guess for a first meeting.”

Culture shock

Shortly after arriving in Storrs, Giffey found that life in America isn’t quite the same as what he was accustomed to in Europe.

Besides the time difference, which took him about a week to adjust to, Giffey struggled initially with some things that many Americans consider to be normal.

“I wasn’t used to the air conditioning,” Giffey said. “I mean there is air conditioning everywhere, and I just got sick for a little time. I was like ‘why do you Americans have air conditioning everywhere?’”

Giffey explained that in Europe, they don’t use much air conditioning, even if it is scorching hot outside. He said that he also found it odd that during the summer he’d be in a dining hall and see people wearing heavy sweaters.

“It’s just kind of strange, you know what I mean?” Giffey said. “If you go into a house and it’s mad cold, then you go out and it’s mad hot?”

According to Olander, the air conditioning wasn’t the only temperature related adjustment Giffey had trouble getting used to at first.

“Some of the stuff was kind of funny, I remember one day we were just in the cafeteria and he was like ‘Dammit!’ And I was like ‘What?’ And he’s like ‘I hate how your drinks are always so cold,’” Olander said. “He’s like ‘Yeah, in Germany, the drinks are never cold, if you want it cold you have to put ice in them, but here the drinks are already kind of cold and you can put more ice in them to make them colder. I was like ‘What?’ That was kind of crazy to me. ‘The drinks are too cold?’”

Enosch Wolf, who was sitting on the bed next to Olander as he was speaking, started to laugh during this story and chimed in.

“He told me about that too, and it’s kind of true,” Wolf said. “In Germany, if you want your drinks cold, you tell people to put ice in it. And here it always comes with ice and it’s always so cold. So I can picture Niels being like ‘Agh, it’s so cold!”

There were other adjustments for Giffey to make too, more cultural than anything else. For instance, Storrs is a much more rural area than his native Berlin. Also, the popularity of football compared to soccer is another stark difference. Regardless, Giffey settled in over time, and now his only focus, like his teammates’, is on basketball.

Being a big man on campus

Giffey and Olander’s dorm room is not unlike any other room you might find a pair of freshmen living in. When you walk in, you see two beds, one on each side of the room. Surrounding each bed is a desk and some decorations.

On Giffey’s side is a big, brown Maui Invitational beach towel that covers the wall like a tapestry. There is a necklace of hula flowers hung on the wall, and a tiny surfboard tied to the shade. By his desk, which sits at the foot of his bed, a team picture is hung on the wall, and under the bed, some clothes and belongings are strewn about, and several pairs of basketball shoes are lined up neatly.

On Olander’s side, however, it looks like a bomb went off. Under the bed is a pile of clothes so deep that you could easily get lost in it. On the wall hangs two old basketball jerseys, Olander’s white E.O. Smith jersey, and his red Xpressions Elite AAU jersey. Above his pillow, two crosses hang from the wall, and at the foot of his bed there is a big, cumbersome TV that’s missing it’s cable wire.

Olander acknowledged that his side is kind of a pit.

“Yeah, I’m not really that clean a person,” Olander said. “But he doesn’t mind because he’s like ‘whatever’ I guess. He doesn’t tell me he minds if he does.”

Beyond the bootstrap decorations, however, there are no posters, and the two don’t have much else other than clothes and the bare essentials.

This is the setting as Giffey sits on his bed, wearing a blue sweater and a pair of grey sweatpants, leaning back against the wall as he tries to explain what it’s like to be a member of the UConn men’s basketball team.

“You can have a pretty nice time because you just enjoy playing at a high level,” Giffey said. “That and school is pretty much your life, you don’t have too much free time. We just got the regular life like everyone I guess.”

That notion may seem a bit odd to the common UConn student, but both Giffey and Olander said that they don’t feel like they are any different than other students.

“It’s like whatever, at the end of the day I’m just a student just like everybody else,” Olander said. “I think in terms of everything, being a UConn basketball player on campus, people tend to look at you a little differently, but in terms of people from my hometown, people I grew up with, there’s no change, it’s the same.”

Giffey said that the prospect of people knowing him and randomly talking to him was strange at first, given the culture of his high school in Germany.

“It was weird. Especially when you go out now, people are just like randomly talking to you, it’s kind of strange, definitely,” Giffey said. “Especially because I wasn’t used to it, I had that atmosphere in my high school, people knew me but they knew me for being a basketball player, but no one ever went to my games or anything like that.”

Giffey explained that in Germany, nobody even knew he played basketball until he was in the 11th grade, when he was playing with the youth national team.

“I had to explain to my teachers that ‘I really need to go to the national team to get better’ and they just didn’t understand,” Giffey said. “They were like ‘Ok, well are you going to do your schoolwork or what?’

According to Giffey, the professors at UConn have been much more accommodating.

Different paths

To say that Giffey and Olander took different paths on their way to Storrs would be a huge understatement. Giffey is from Europe and he played for the German club team Alba Berlin, along with the U-20 national team, before being recruited by assistant coach Andre LaFleur during a recruiting trip through the country.

“He saw me at an away game in north Germany,” Giffey said. “They’d already been recruiting me, like, checking me out, so they came to Germany to see one of my games.”

Olander, on the other hand, grew up in nearby Mansfield, Conn., and played his high school ball at nearby E.O. Smith High School. Unlike most prospects, Olander had the UConn basketball program right in his backyard, and as a result, he got to know the program better a lot earlier than most get to.

“When I was, I think, a sophomore or a freshman, [UConn players] were inviting my brother to come up and play pick-up and I would just come along and play too,” Olander said. “And from there I guess, probably when I was a sophomore, I would just come up and play pick-up, I did that every summer.”

Olander’s brother Ryan would go on to play basketball at Fairfield, where he is currently the team’s starting center as a junior, but Tyler stuck around. He got to know many of the team’s older players, including the recently graduated Gavin Edwards, and over time, the program began to take a closer look at him.

“They started coming to me my junior year,” Olander said. “Coach [Patrick] Sellers started coming to some of my games, and then they offered me that summer going into my senior year.”

Olander committed to UConn after the end of his senior season. He said his reasons were because he felt it would be the best fit for him, and he liked the fact that it was close enough that his parents could come to all of his college games, as they had during high school.

For Giffey, the program’s history and track record were a lot more important than it’s proximity to home.

“We had a big freshman class, which gave me at least a chance to develop myself and to have a chance to compete right away,” Giffey said. “I feel like that’s one of the main reasons, and – oh, a hall of fame coach right here, that was one of the major reasons too. You’ve got a good history of winning and a bunch of players who went to the NBA, those are the main reasons.”

Playing at the next level

Giffey’s breakout performance against Kentucky in the Maui Invitational championship game turned a lot of heads. After scoring 14 points and helping complete UConn’s stunning arrival back onto the national stage, Giffey suddenly found himself right in the middle of the national spotlight, and the feedback started pouring in.

“It was exciting to see UConn do so well and have Niels play such a big role,” said Henrik Rödl, who coached Giffey while he was playing for the U-19 Alba Berlin team in Germany. “I felt happy for him and proud to be his coach for the last three years.”

Rödl, now the coach of TBB Trier in the German Basketball Bundesliga, also played in the Maui Invitational back in 1989 when he was a freshman at North Carolina. He and Giffey keep in touch, and he said he expects Giffey to keep improving over time.

“Niels is a very smart and reflective person, mature beyond his actual age,” Rödl said. “I think he’s doing incredibly well considering the cultural and basketball challenges he faces.”

Though the Maui Invitational final was a high point for Giffey and the rest of the team, the rest of the season hasn’t been sunshine and butterflies.

 

Giffey’s outburst last Thursday against Marquette helped get UConn back into the game, but ultimately it wasn’t enough to stop the Huskies from losing in overtime. Over the course of the year, they have seen limited minutes, and are averaging 2.7 and 1.3 points per game respectively.

“In the beginning of the season I was feeling really good, and I was feeling really confident about myself and my game,” Giffey said. “But right now I’m seeing less and less minutes, and I guess it’s part of the freshman experience, everyone struggles sometimes.”

Olander has had a very particular form of adversity that he’s been struggling to overcome. He has started a lot of games, but in many cases he will be pulled after the first mistake, and often doesn’t see the court again for the rest of the game. Olander called this both a source of frustration and motivation for him.

“It’s a little bit of both, because, I mean, [coach Calhoun] will pull me out for any mistake that I make, when I get in there I try to be perfect and not make any mistakes,” Olander said. “Your every move and every mistake will be noticed and put under a magnifying glass and blown up, so you’ve got to make sure that everything your doing is what you’re supposed to be doing.”

Despite the struggles, each have seen flashes of success to point towards early in their career. For Giffey it was the Maui Invitational championship, for Olander, that game came a few weeks later when UConn blew out Harvard. Olander was a perfect 3-for-3 from the field, scoring seven points while grabbing seven boards in that game.

If nothing else, the performances should serve as inspiration to look towards when things aren’t going well.

Either way, both players acknowledged that they knew playing at UConn wouldn’t be a nice, smooth ride.

“I knew it wouldn’t be easy to play here,” Giffey said. “I knew that I would be facing more athletic people…I feel like it’s a good step to go if you’re a European.”

Drawn together

The UConn student body first met Giffey and Olander on the night of Oct. 15, 2010. While coach Calhoun was arguing his case before the NCAA committee on infractions, the rest of the team was back in Storrs for the First Night pep rally.

Obscured by a silhouette, Olander approached the court and emerged from behind the curtain into the spotlight as his name was announced to the thousands of cheering fans in attendance.

And with all eyes on him for the first time, he busted out a move that vaguely resembled dancing while sporting this big, goofy grin on his face.

Following right behind him was Giffey, who took his turn in the spotlight and followed his friend and roommate with a simple, effective and appropriate move of his own – the shopping cart.

It was a light-hearted, goofy moment, the perfect first impression to deliver the fans. Yet in many ways, it was also the culmination of a journey that brought these two basketball players together, and the start of a new one that will take them, along with their five fellow classmates, through a college career that has only just begun to unfold.

Olander and Giffey grew up 3,853 miles apart, and each took a much different road to get to UConn. Giffey played for club teams and national teams before arriving after a long plane ride across a continent and an ocean. Olander played at the high school next door and then just walked down the street. But both wound up in the same place together under the same roof in a small, nondescript (and somewhat messy) dorm room to play basketball for a hall of fame coach at one of college basketball’s most storied programs.

Only time will tell how their legacy in Storrs will ultimately be defined, but as they work towards their future, if nothing else, they will have each other to lean on throughout it all.

“Definitely,” Olander said. “I love having Niels as a roommate.”

Schools lose out at BCS

By Mac Cerullo

This article was originally published in UConn’s Daily Campus on April 25, 2012.

UConn’s trip to the 2011 Fiesta Bowl was a milestone for the football program. It marked the first time the school had earned the Big East’s automatic bid to the Bowl Championship Series, and meant the school would play Oklahoma, one of the nation’s most prestigious teams, in a nationally televised game on New Years Day.

But the experience came at a great cost. The team had to travel over 2,200 miles to the site of the game in Glendale, Ariz., and once there, the school was contractually obligated to spend eight days at a hotel of the Fiesta Bowl’s choosing and sell 17,500 tickets to the game. The school could not negotiate its hotel rates, and it was unable to sell most of the tickets it was required to sell, forcing the school to eat $2.9 million of unsold tickets.

In the end, UConn lost nearly $1.8 million at the game.

“It was a high number, there’s no question,” said Mike Enright, UConn’s associate director of athletics for communications. “I think it would have been interesting from a BCS standpoint [if] Stanford went to the Fiesta Bowl and we went to the Orange Bowl, would both schools have benefited from them making the switch?”

It’s impossible to know whether UConn would have done better in another situation, but while the amount UConn lost at the Fiesta Bowl was eye-popping, the fact that the school lost money is not unusual.

A review of bowl documents from each school that has appeared in the BCS over the past three years revealed that most schools who participated in the postseason lost money. The Daily Campus obtained records from 26 of the 30 total teams during that timeframe. The teams not accounted for were Stanford and Texas Christian University, both private schools that are not required to disclose financial information. Both Stanford and TCU appeared in the BCS twice over the past three years.

The biggest costs of playing in the BCS were transportation, meals, lodging and unsold ticket expenses, most of which are directly related to the terms of playing in the bowl games. Many schools received some help from their conferences with unsold tickets however, and in many cases this help meant the difference between posting a profit or a loss.

Specifically, the investigation revealed the following information.

  • Schools that participated in the BCS between 2010 and 2012 lost close to $130,000 on average. If you factor in the cost of unsold tickets that conferences bought up, that number jumps to over $400,000.
  • On average, schools spent $2.3 million at BCS bowl games, including $576,009 on transportation, $764,948 on meals and lodging, $420,778 on unsold tickets and $559,971 on other expenses, such as awards, entertainment, promotion and equipment.
  • The last three national champions all lost money. In 2010, Alabama lost $1.86 million at the BCS National Championship game. In 2011, Auburn lost $614,106, and this past year, Alabama lost $1.9 million.
  • More than half of all teams whose data was available (16 of 26) incurred greater expenses than revenue at their game. Five of those teams ended up posting small profits after their conferences helped buy up tickets, and the remaining 11 posted losses.

One school that received help from its conference but lost money anyway was Virginia Tech. Between the 2011 Orange Bowl and the 2012 Sugar Bowl, Virginia Tech lost $954,214 despite the Atlantic Coast Conference absorbing 17,123 unsold tickets worth over $2.1 million.

In both years, Virginia Tech received roughly $1.7 million from the ACC to cover its expenses, but that wasn’t enough in either case. Once transportation, meals, lodging and other miscellaneous costs were factored in, the school’s expenses added up to about $2.2 million in each year, resulting in losses close to $500,000 each time.

Those numbers were actually a major improvement for Virginia Tech too, considering that the school took a historic $2.2 million loss at the 2009 Orange Bowl, according to Virginia Tech bowl documents.

“There’s not financial gain to be made,” Virginia Tech athletic director Jim Weaver told The Virginian-Pilot in a 2010 article about the losses. “The benefit is the exposure of your program. The system is what it is.”

That fact might come as a surprise to many, given that bowl games always advertise massive payouts for their participating teams. According to a Huffington Post report, some of the payouts this year were as high as $22.3 million.

“Participating in a bowl game does not always equate to a financial windfall,” said Amy Perko, executive director of the Knight Commission on Intercollegiate Athletics, an independent panel of experts that serves as a watchdog over college sports. “That’s been a public misperception because the public sees the hundreds of millions of dollars associated with bowl games and there’s just a basic assumption that ‘Oh if our team participates in a bowl game that’s going to result in a financial windfall,’ and that’s just not the case.”

The bowl games do issue big payouts, but that money does not go directly to the participating schools. Instead, it goes to the school’s conference, along with the bowl money generated by all the other schools in the conference that go to bowl games. The conference then distributes a certain amount of money to the schools that reached bowl games to help cover expenses, usually between $1.7 million and $2.5 million.

Some conferences, like the ACC and the Big 12, also reimburse a certain amount of unsold tickets before dividing up the bowl money. For many schools, this help made a big difference. Oklahoma, UConn’s opponent in the 2011 Fiesta Bowl, turned a profit of $9,350 after the Big 12 absorbed $1.8 million in unsold tickets for them.

The Big East does not reimburse its schools for unsold tickets, meaning when UConn struggled to sell tickets to the Fiesta Bowl, it had no insurance policy.

Once the revenue has been distributed to each of the bowl teams, whatever is left over gets divided equally among each school in the conference as part of the conference’s annual revenue distribution, including schools that didn’t qualify for bowl games.

That means last year UConn received the same share of revenue from the Big East as Rutgers, who finished last in the Big East. Rutgers also didn’t go to a bowl, meaning it didn’t incur any bowl-related expenses like UConn did.

By that thinking, the argument could be made that it is better for schools to avoid playing in bowl games, although school officials don’t see it that way.

“You can’t put a price tag on the exposure we got to go to the Fiesta Bowl,” Enright said. “You certainly wouldn’t say we never want to go to a bowl game again because it will save us money, because that’s not true.”

The line of thinking is that over the long run, things will even out because schools that lose money at a bowl one year will still get conference revenue in later years when they don’t go to a bowl game.

“That is the nature of conference membership,” Bill Hancock, the executive director of the BCS, told The Arizona Republic in a Sept. 2011 report. “If you have a downtime and you are in a conference, you have an insurance policy. You can reap the benefits of having an uptime. It all goes in a cycle.”

Enright also pointed out that programs that consistently do poorly and miss bowl games end up suffering on the bottom line anyway for more conventional reasons.

“You have to look at it more widespread because of interest in the program, more TV revenue, selling more season tickets,” Enright said. “You can’t look at it so narrowly.”

Regardless, critics of the system argue that schools shouldn’t be losing money in postseason football events.

“The end result doesn’t sound like a system that’s designed to reward the teams that have success,” Perko said.“UConn’s situation is not an anomaly, there have been other universities that have their better financial years in the years that they don’t qualify for a bowl game because they don’t have to take that financial loss.”

Perko also said that the bowl system needs a reevaluation, and that it should be structured in a way that benefits the participating universities without creating more costs than necessary.

One potential change could be to reduce the ticket burden on the schools.

There are a number of factors that contribute to poor ticket sales for schools at bowl games. One is the distance from the game. Many schools are selected to play in bowl games that are very far from campus, making travel costs for fans steep. Another is competition from secondary markets. Websites like StubHub offer bowl tickets at much cheaper prices, providing little incentive to buy through the school.

“I think the secondary ticket market can’t be overestimated,” Enright said.

Out of all the teams who played in the BCS over the past three years, no team sold out its allotment of tickets. Even at the 2012 BCS National Championship game in New Orleans, neither Louisiana State University nor Alabama sold out their tickets, despite the fact that the game was played a short drive from each school’s campus.

While both schools did sell over 15,000 tickets each, high expenses in other areas helped contribute to big losses for both teams. LSU lost $1 million after spending $754,118 on meals and lodging, $526,924 on unsold tickets, $194,443 on administrative expenses and $1,344,154 on compensation and fringe benefits that kicked in for the game, among other costs.

Alabama, who shut out LSU to claim the national championship 21-0 this past January, lost $1.9 million after spending $846,704 on meals and lodging, $770,152 on unsold tickets, $1,593,101 on bonuses, $186,584 on administrative expenses and $207,553 on awards. The year before, Auburn lost $614,106 after incurring travel expenses over $1 million, meal and lodging expenses of $886,718, and $781,825 in unsold tickets, among other costs.

“When Alabama and Auburn play in the national championship game and they got to absorb ticket money? It’s amazing!” Enright said. “I would guess for Alabama and Auburn, if there was some sort of requirement that they buy the tickets through the school they would have sold out their allotment.”

The key to coming out with a profit, the data showed, was to minimize expenses and sell as many tickets as possible. While many schools struggled to keep costs down, there were some examples of schools that went to BCS bowls and came out in the black.

The most profitable trip to the BCS over the past three years came in 2010, when Boise State played TCU in the Fiesta Bowl. Not only did the Broncos win 17-10, but they brought home $1.6 million in profits. Boise State sold nearly all of their tickets, and had the second lowest total expenses of all schools over the past three years.

The team with the lowest expenses was Cincinnati, the 2010 Big East champion who represented the conference in the Sugar Bowl. Cincinnati was blown out by a Tim Tebow led Florida squad 51-24, but the school came out with over $1 million in profits thanks to strong ticket sales and very low transportation costs.

No other schools approached $1 million in profits, however, and the fact that so many schools are struggling with the costs associated with BCS bowl games will likely be addressed during the upcoming BCS negotiations this spring.

“This is not a situation that is going to go on unnoticed by administrators,” Enright said, also saying that the fact that bowls are managed by private organizations, and not the NCAA, is also something that will likely be addressed.

“The system is currently undergoing a reevaluation, and that’s been needed,” Perko said. “Hopefully whatever results come out of these decisions that are going to be made over the next couple months will better serve the universities from a financial standpoint.”

This story received Fifth Prize for Enterprise Reporting in the Hearst Journalism Awards Program’s national competition.

UConn loses nearly $1.8 million at Fiesta Bowl

By Mac Cerullo

This story was originally published in UConn’s Daily Campus on March 3, 2011. 

The UConn athletic department lost nearly $1.8 million at the 2011 Fiesta Bowl, according to bowl documents obtained by The Daily Campus.

The university incurred total expenses of $4,280,998 at the Fiesta Bowl while only receiving a payout of $2,523,200 from the Big East.

By far the largest expense the university incurred came from absorbed ticket sales. The university sold only 2,771 out of an allotment of 17,500 tickets, resulting in the university absorbing 14,729 tickets worth $2,924,385.

The official figure of 2,771 tickets sold is substantially lower than the previously reported amount of 4,600 tickets sold.

That expense completely soaked up UConn’s revenue allotment of $2.5 million from the Big East all by itself. UConn’s losses were then further inflamed by the costs of travel, meals, lodging and other bowl expenses.

The UConn athletic department did not respond to a voicemail left at the office requesting comment, but the Fiesta Bowl documents obtained did come with a survey to the NCAA that included comments from the university on its satisfaction with certain aspects of the bowl.

In regards to the level of satisfaction with the bowl’s ticket commitment for participating teams and the bowl’s ticket prices, the university gave the bowl a “neutral” rating for both.

“We recognize the total ticket commitment associated with this BCS bowl game, but selling 17,500 tickets is a challenge for a school from the east whose fans incur significant travel expenses,” the comment from the athletic department reads in the NCAA survey.

Travel expenses for the university were extensive as well. UConn spent a total of $685,195 on travel, spending $315,378 on 213 members of the team, coaching staff and administration over eight days ($1,481 per person) and $369,817 on 335 members of the band and cheering squad over three days ($1,104 per person).

On meals and lodging, UConn spent a total of $460,941. Of that, the university spent $215 per day on each of the 213 members of the team, staff and administration over the course of eight days, as well as $94 per day on each of the 335 members of the band and cheering squad over three days.

Other expenses that UConn incurred included entertainment, promotion, awards, equipment and supplies, administrative, band facility rental, bag tags and lanyards. These expenses combined totaled $210,477.

UConn’s nearly $1.8 million loss at the Fiesta Bowl is huge even when you consider that most schools either just break even or incur losses at bowl games. One of the biggest financial disasters at a BCS bowl game came in 2009 when Virginia Tech lost $2.2 million at the Orange Bowl, according to bowl documents obtained from Virginia Tech.

Virginia Tech’s expenses at that game, however, were only $3.8 million compared to UConn’s total expenses of nearly $4.3 million. Virginia Tech’s losses were inflamed by receiving a substantially smaller bowl payout from the ACC.

The last Big East team to participate in the Fiesta Bowl before UConn was West Virginia, who faced Oklahoma at the bowl in 2008. According to bowl documents obtained from West Virginia, the school’s losses only totaled about $1 million, nearly half that of UConn.

West Virginia received a similar payout as UConn from the Big East, but their expenses totaled $3.5 million. West Virginia’s numbers were bolstered by their stronger ticket sales, out of an allotment of 17,500, the school sold 7,981 compared to UConn’s 2,771.

The document does not include bonuses awarded to former head coach Randy Edsall, his coaching staff, athletic director Jeff Hathaway or any other athletic department administrators. The document also does not include revenue earned on Fiesta Bowl related merchandise or sponsorship.

This story was part of a larger series on the Bowl Championship Series and the financial difficulties participating schools incurred, and later won Third Prize for Sports Writing in the Hearst Journalism Awards Program’s national competition. 

An unexpected run to glory

By Mac Cerullo

This article was originally published in UConn’s Daily Campus on April 5, 2011, following the UConn men’s basketball team’s victory over Butler to win its third national championship.

HOUSTON – On March 5, things looked bleak. The Huskies had ended the regular season having lost four out of five games, and in the regular season finale, they suffered a devastating loss to Notre Dame on their own home floor.

According to coach Jim Calhoun, the team looked dejected, disheartened and defeated after that loss. For the first time, he said, they didn’t look like themselves.

So in the first practice before the Big East tournament, Calhoun challenged the team to be better.

“I’m not going to quit on you,” Calhoun said. “And I’m not going to let you quit on yourselves.”

What followed was one of the most intense practices that Calhoun had put the team through all year. He worked them, challenged them, and drilled them for hours on end. But when it was over, the Huskies emerged a different team, and as the tournament began, the team began to realize its potential.

The Huskies blew out DePaul in the first round of the Big East Tournament. The 97-71 win was expected, but it was a comforting sign just the same. Having ended the season so poorly, the Huskies needed some sort of momentum to build on, and in the second round, that momentum started to look more promising.

UConn blew out a solid Georgetown team 79-62 in the second round. The Hoyas were without one of their best players in Chris Wright, who was injured, but the win showed that something was different about the Huskies. It was the kind of performance that UConn hadn’t been able to put together all year against another good team, and it proved to be a sign of things to come as the Huskies faced their nemesis the next day ­– Pittsburgh.

On Dec. 28, 2010, UConn faced Pittsburgh for the first time, and it wasn’t even a contest. The Panthers outplayed UConn in every facet of the game, and early in their Big East quarterfinal rematch, it seemed that Pittsburgh was ready to hand UConn the same kind of defeat.

But then the Huskies responded.

Recovering from an early 12-point deficit, the Huskies tied the game before halftime, and then hung with Pittsburgh in the second half right until the end, when Kemba Walker delivered one of the season’s iconic moments, a beautiful, ankle-breaking buzzer beater that sent Pittsburgh home early and gave UConn the confidence it needed to keep going.

After all, Pittsburgh crushed them before, and they were one of the best teams in the country. If they could beat Pittsburgh, then they could beat anybody, the team thought.

That win was the tipping point for the Huskies. From that point on, the Huskies believed they could beat any team they faced, and as they kept advancing, that’s exactly what they did. They beat Syracuse and Louisville to cap off the incredible run to the Big East championship, and then they kept going into the NCAA Tournament, easily brushing aside Bucknell in the first round before beating a tough Cincinnati team in the second.

The experience in New York would prove vital in the West Regional, when UConn was subjected to two fantastic teams in San Diego State and Arizona that were physical, had great frontcourts and brought rabid fanbases with them. Both were the type of game that UConn would have lost in February, but led by Walker and bolstered by Jeremy Lamb, the Huskies overcame, winning both games in nail biting fashion.

The road to Houston was not a smooth one, from the roller coaster Big East season to the wild run to the Final Four, UConn proved that they were more than just a lower-tier Big East team. The Huskies performance in the Final Four and second half dominance against Butler is a testament to the type of group they are – a group that won 11 straight postseason games in under a month to become national champions.

National title end to a fairy tale season

By Mac Cerullo

This column was originally published in UConn’s Daily Campus on April 5, 2011, following the men’s basketball team’s victory over Butler in the National Championship game in Houston, Texas.

This was more than just one shining moment.

This was a fairytale, an ending that no one could have seen coming, the kind of story that they’ll one day make into a Disney movie.

This was vindication for a coach who has dealt with the kind of adversity that would crush a lesser man.

And this was a team that will never be forgotten.

“I’ve been fortunate enough to have some great teams at UConn,” coach Jim Calhoun said after the game. “Very honestly, this group to me will always be incredibly special… This group has taken me on one of the great special journeys that was better than I could possibly imagine.”

Coach Calhoun has said time and again how much he loved this team, that he loved how great they were to coach, how much they listened and how hard they worked in practice and strove to get better.

With every win, every improbable win over the course of this past month, they convinced more and more people that they had what it took to climb the mountain.

And in the end, they will go down in history as a special group that overcame all odds to become national champions.

“We had a lot of doubters,” said Kemba Walker after the game. “[We were] picked to finish 10th in the Big East. We finished 9th, but I still thought we overachieved. Big East tournament, we came out strong. We got a lot of confidence from that tournament. We kind of felt unstoppable, that’s why we’re national champions. We’re the best team in the country.”

As the players and coaches cut down the nets, and the “one shining moment” montage began to play on the big screen, athletic director Jeff Hathaway stood and watched as the confetti fell around him.

“I’m just thrilled for [Calhoun],” Hathaway said. “And I’m thrilled that it came in a year where he felt so good about this team and so good about these players and just capped it off with an amazing postseason run that nobody could have ever imagined.”

For the fans in attendance, the scene was a dream come true. It was the type of moment that you could only hope to witness during your college career.

“This is the most unbelievable feeling,” said Kyle Campbell, a 6th-semester visual media science major. “Going into the year nobody thought this would happen, but you know what, they showed resilience and relentlessness, and this team had the character and the leadership, and they put it all together here in Houston.”

Ben Allain, an 8th-semester actuarial science major, was moved to tears after the game, and summed up his emotions much more bluntly.

“This is the greatest day of my life.”

The feeling of winning a national championship will likely not sink in for the players or coaches for a long time, but the gravity of the accomplishment was clear as the team departed the court, when they suddenly found themselves in the company of greatness.

Rip Hamilton, Charlie Villaneuva, Ben Gordon, Donyell Marshall, Hasheem Thabeet and more all made it out to Houston to watch the next great UConn team reach their crowning glory. Many won championship at UConn, many did not, but from now on, Kemba Walker and the rest of the 2010-11 Huskies will be in that pantheon.

“This is great, this is history,” Thabeet said. “I’m happy for the guys, I’m happy for UConn, this is what we do, we win championships.”

It’s been a wild ride, from the opening tipoff of the Big East Tournament to the final buzzer of the championship game. This may have been the program’s third national title, but what we’ve witnessed over this past month was special. We will never see a team like this at UConn again, and we may never see a run like this anywhere again.

Cherish this team, and cherish this moment. You never know what the future may hold, but for now, the UConn Huskies are the national champions.

And that’s truly an amazing thing.